Why the study?
ESC guidelines recommend ICD implantation for DCM patients carrying arrhythmia-associated pathogenic variants, but evidence from large East Asian cohorts remains limited.
Does the presence of high-risk arrhythmic genotypes increase the risk of major ventricular arrhythmia in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does the presence of high-risk arrhythmic genotypes increase the risk of major ventricular arrhythmia in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
In a Japanese cohort of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, ESC-defined high-risk genotypes were associated with a more than 3-fold increased risk of major ventricular arrhythmias, supporting current guideline recommendations for genotype-based risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genotype may aid MVA risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background Current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) carrying arrhythmia-associated pathogenic variants. However, evidence from large East Asian cohorts remains limited. Purpose To investigate the incidence of major ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) by genotype among patients with DCM. Methods We analyzed data from a multicentre retrospective study of genetically tested probands with DCM from 22 cardiovascular centres in Japan. Patients were categorized as (1) pathogenic variants in high-risk genes (LMNA, PLN, FLNC, TMEM43, RBM20, DSP, or DES), (2) other pathogenic variants, and (3) pathogenic variants negative. The primary outcome was MVA, including sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or sudden cardiac death. Event rates were summarized with Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results Among 1,240 patients analyzed, pathogenic/likely-pathogenic variants were identified in 332 (26.8%) patients, of whom 88 (7.1%) patients had pathogenic variants in high-risk genes. Patients with high-risk genotype were younger at diagnosis and had a higher prevalence of a family history of cardiomyopathy compared with the genotype-negative group. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2,209 (1,001–4,111) days. MVA occurred in 10 (14.7%) patients with high-risk gene variants, 11 (5.1%) patients with other pathogenic variants, and 31 (4.2%) patients with pathogenic variants negative. The high-risk genotype group had a higher risk of MVA (hazard ratio 3.11 [95% CI: 1.67–5.80, p<0.001]) compared to the genotype-negative group. The risk of MVA was similar across baseline left ventricular ejection fraction in the high-risk genotype group. Conclusion In this East Asian DCM cohort, ESC-defined high-risk arrhythmia-associated genotypes had a markedly increased risk of MVA. These findings support the applicability of current ESC genotype-based risk stratification to East Asian populations and may help refine ICD decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanaoka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: