Key result
S-ICD therapy in youth demonstrates consistent shock and complication rates across underlying cardiac diseases.
Why the study?
Data comparing S-ICD performance across different underlying cardiac diseases in paediatric and young adult patients remain limited.
Does subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy have consistent safety and efficacy across different underlying cardiac diseases in paediatric and young adult patients?
Cohort (n=223)
Yes
Does subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy have consistent safety and efficacy across different underlying cardiac diseases in paediatric and young adult patients?
S-ICD therapy demonstrates consistent safety and efficacy outcomes across different underlying cardiac aetiologies in paediatric and young adult patients, supporting its broad applicability in this population.
May support broad S-ICD applicability across aetiologies in youth; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) are increasingly used in paediatric and young adult patients as an alternative to transvenous systems, particularly in the presence of complex anatomy or long-term vascular risk. However, data comparing S-ICD performance across different underlying cardiac diseases remain limited. The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-ICD therapy according to the underlying cardiac condition in patients enrolled in the SIDECAR registry. Methods The SIDECAR registry included consecutive paediatric and young adult patients who received an S-ICD across 12 European centres. Patients were stratified by underlying diagnosis: congenital heart disease (CHD), cardiomyopathy (CMP), channelopathy (CHAN), and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). Outcomes included appropriate and inappropriate shocks (IAS), and complications. Results A total of 223 patients were analysed: 31 (14%) CHD, 119 (53%) CMP, 39 (18%) CHAN, and 34 (15%) IVF. Median follow-up was 28 months. Rates of appropriate shocks, IAS, and complications were 25.7% (95% CI: 17.5-33.9), 19.6% (95% CI: 12.2-27.0), 5.0% (95% CI: 1.6-8.4) at 5 years, respectively. No significant difference in freedom from appropriate shock (log-rank p=0.593), IAS (p=0.897) or complication rate (p=0.793) was observed between subgroups. The mechanism of IAS differed across groups, with T-wave oversensing predominating in CHD and CMP, non-cardiac oversensing in CHAN and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in IVF. Conclusions In this large paediatric S-ICD cohort, outcomes were consistent across different cardiac aetiologies, supporting its broad applicability in young patients with inherited or structural heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silvetti et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Underlying cardiac diseases requiring S-ICD (n=223). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) vs. Comparison across underlying cardiac diseases (CHD, CMP, CHAN, IVF) was evaluated on Appropriate shocks, inappropriate shocks (IAS), and complications (p=0.593). Subcutaneous ICD therapy in 223 paediatric and young adult patients showed consistent 5-year rates of appropriate shocks (25.7%) and complications (5.0%) across different underlying cardiac diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: