After discontinuation of blinded study treatment for cancer VTE, anticoagulation was continued in 86.4% of patients (62.7% full-dose, 36.9% reduced-dose) and stopped in 13.6%.
RCT (n=1,458)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
What are the real-world investigator decisions regarding anticoagulation continuation and dosing for cancer patients with VTE following extended treatment?
Prior to the unblinding of the API-CAT trial, investigators continued anticoagulation in most cancer VTE patients but with highly variable dosing, highlighting a therapeutic grey zone in clinical practice.
Absolute Event Rate: 86.4% vs 13.6%
Abstract Background The API-CAT trial demonstrated that reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) was noninferior to full-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, while resulting in fewer clinically relevant bleeding events. Although these findings are expected to influence clinical practice, real-world data on physicians’ anticoagulation decisions in this setting remain limited. Objectives To describe investigators’ anticoagulant treatment decisions for patients enrolled in the API-CAT trial after discontinuation of blinded study treatment and prior to trial unblinding and dissemination of results. Methods This descriptive analysis included patients from the prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind API-CAT trial who received at least one dose of study medication. Investigators prospectively documented anticoagulation management following either premature or planned discontinuation of blinded apixaban. Decisions were categorized as treatment discontinuation, continuation at a reduced dose, or continuation at a full dose. Descriptive analyses examined treatment choices according to patient characteristics, cancer features, and contextual factors. Results Of 1,766 randomized patients, 1,458 (82.6%) were included in the analysis. After discontinuation of study treatment, anticoagulation was stopped in 198 patients (13.6%) and continued in 1,260 (86.4%). Among those continuing therapy, 790 patients (62.7%) received full-dose anticoagulation, 465 (36.9%) received a reduced dose, 5 unknown. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were prescribed in 89.6% of cases, and low-molecular-weight heparin in 9.9%. Treatment decisions were generally consistent across patient and cancer characteristics but varied according to timing of treatment discontinuation, physician specialty, and country. Conclusions Prior to unblinding of the API-CAT trial, treatment decisions appeared poorly driven by clinical characteristics, reflecting a “therapeutic grey zone” where anticoagulation was continued in most patients but with highly variable dosing. This exploratory snapshot provides a baseline to monitor the anticipated shift toward wider adoption of reduced-dose apixaban for extended anticoagulation following publication of the API-CAT results. The substantial proportion of treatment discontinuation highlights the need for further studies to identify patients who may safely stop therapy.
Mahé et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=1,458). Anticoagulation continuation vs. Treatment discontinuation was evaluated on Anticoagulant treatment decisions (continuation vs discontinuation). After discontinuation of blinded study treatment for cancer VTE, anticoagulation was continued in 86.4% of patients (62.7% full-dose, 36.9% reduced-dose) and stopped in 13.6%.