Key result
A subgroup of patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance had a remote latest activated left ventricular site compared to patients with LBBB, which may explain their high non-response rate to current cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Why the study?
Patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance respond less favorably to CRT, hypothesized to be because their latest activated left ventricular site differs from that in left bundle branch block.
Cohort (n=187)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patients with an NICD-2 pattern have a remote latest activated left ventricular site compared to those with LBBB, potentially explaining poor CRT response in this subgroup.
BACKGROUND: Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), devised to eliminate dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block (LBBB), works by pacing the latest activated left ventricular site (LALVS). We hypothesized that patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) pattern respond less favorably to CRT, because their LALVS is far away from that in LBBB. METHODS: = 33). RESULTS: away from the LALVS, the LALVSs were located leftward, posterosuperior in the LBBB group, slightly left, superior in the NICD-1 subgroup, and slightly left, posteroinferior in the NICD-2 subgroup. The LALVS determined by ECG and echocardiography matched in all patients, except two. CONCLUSIONS: In the NICD-2 subgroup, a remote LALVS was found from that in LBBB pattern, which might explain the high non-response rate of the NICD pattern to the current CRT technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katona et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=187). Nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) pattern vs. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern was evaluated on Mean frontal plane resultant secondary ST vector position (degrees) to estimate the latest activated left ventricular site (p=<0.001). A subgroup of patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance had a remote latest activated left ventricular site compared to patients with LBBB, which may explain their high non-response rate to current cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: