Key result
Presence of a baseline left bundle branch block was a significant predictor of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to non-LBBB patterns (OR 7.45).
Why the study?
Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy remains a challenge, particularly regarding the role of baseline QRS pattern in biventricular function improvement.
Does baseline LBBB pattern predict improvement in biventricular ejection fraction compared to non-LBBB patterns in patients undergoing CRT?
Cohort (n=56)
Yes
Does baseline LBBB pattern predict improvement in biventricular ejection fraction compared to non-LBBB patterns in patients undergoing CRT?
Odds Ratio: 7.45 (95% CI 1.8–30.94)
p-value: p=0.006
The presence of LBBB is a strong independent predictor of positive biventricular functional response to CRT, whereas patients with non-LBBB patterns show significantly less benefit.
BACKGROUND: Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a challenge. We evaluated the role of baseline QRS pattern to predict response in terms of improvement in biventricular ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: Consecutive patients (pts) undergoing CRT implantation underwent radionuclide angiography at baseline and at mid-term follow-up. The relationship between baseline QRS pattern and mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis was evaluated. Changes in left and right ventricular EF (LVEF and RVEF) were analyzed with regard to baseline QRS pattern. RESULTS: We enrolled 56 pts, 32 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), 4 with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 20 with non-specific intraventricular conduction disturbance (IVCD). A total of 48 pts completed follow-up. LBBB pts had significantly greater improvement in LVEF compared to RBBB or non-specific IVCD pts (+9.6 ± 10.9% vs. +2.6 ± 7.6%, p = 0.003). Response (defined as ≥ 5% increase in LVEF) was observed in 68% of LBBB vs. 24% of non-specific IVCD pts (p = 0.006). None of the RBBB pts were responders. RVEF was significantly improved in LBBB (+5.0 ± 9.0%, p = 0.007), but not in non-specific IVCD and RBBB pts (+0.4 ± 5.8%, p = 0.76). At multivariate analysis, LBBB was the only predictor of LVEF response (OR, 7.45; 95% CI 1.80-30.94; p = 0.006), but not QRS duration or extent of mechanical dyssynchrony. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of a LBBB is a marker of a positive response to CRT in terms of biventricular improvement. Pts with non-LBBB pattern show significantly less benefit from CRT than those with LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domenichini et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Congestive heart failure (n=56). Baseline Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB) vs. Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB) or non-specific intraventricular conduction disturbance (IVCD) was evaluated on Response to CRT (≥ 5% increase in LVEF) (OR 7.45, 95% CI 1.80-30.94, p=0.006). Presence of a baseline left bundle branch block was a significant predictor of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to non-LBBB patterns (OR 7.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: