Key result
The RT-ERA-Cas12a assay detected goose astrovirus with a sensitivity limit of 2 copies and demonstrated a 33.33% positive detection rate in clinical samples, perfectly matching real-time PCR results.
Why the study?
Fatal gout in geese caused by goose astrovirus has been spreading rapidly in China, highlighting the need for simple, convenient, and sensitive detection.
Absolute Event Rate: 33.33% vs 33.33%
The combination of RT-ERA and CRISPR-Cas12a provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for detecting goose astrovirus, suitable for farm surveillance.
Fatal gout in geese caused by goose astrovirus (GAstV) has been spreading rapidly in China since 2018, causing serious economic losses in the goose breeding industry. To achieve simple, convenient and sensitive detection of GAstV, a novel diagnostic test was developed by combining reverse transcription-enzymatic recombinase amplification (RT-ERA) and CRISPR-Cas12a technologies. RT-ERA primers were designed to pre-amplify the conserved region of the ORF2 gene of GAstV and the predefined target sequence detected using the Cas12a/crRNA complex at 37℃ for 30 min. Specific detection of GAstV was achieved with no cross-reaction with non-GAstV templates and a sensitivity detection limit of 2 copies. The experimental procedure could be completed within 1 h, including RNA extraction (15 min), RT-ERA reaction (20 min), CRISPR-Cas12a/crRNA detection (5 min) and result readout (within 2 min) steps. In conclusion, the combination of RT-ETA and CRISPR-Cas12a provides a rapid and specific method that should be effective for the control and surveillance of GAstV infections in farms from remote locations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2022) studied Goose astrovirus (GAstV) infection (n=30). RT-ERA-Cas12a assay vs. real-time PCR (qPCR) was evaluated on Positive detection rate of GAstV in clinical samples. The RT-ERA-Cas12a assay detected goose astrovirus with a sensitivity limit of 2 copies and demonstrated a 33.33% positive detection rate in clinical samples, perfectly matching real-time PCR results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: