Key result
Dual therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant and a P2Y12 inhibitor significantly reduces bleeding compared to triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
The ideal antithrombotic management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective PCI or in ACS has not been definitively established.
Does dual therapy reduce bleeding compared to triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does dual therapy reduce bleeding compared to triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Relative Risk: 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.78)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.4% vs 20.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Dual therapy (DOAC + P2Y12 inhibitor) significantly reduces bleeding risk compared to triple therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI, with comparable overall efficacy but a slight increase in stent thrombosis risk.
Optimal antithrombotic regimen for AF patients undergoing PCI or ACS remains unsettled; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs to inform practice.
The ideal antithrombotic management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention or in acute coronary syndrome has not been definitively established yet. Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitors) reduces stent thrombosis and subsequent ischemic events. In turn, the presence of atrial fibrillation requires oral anticoagulation to prevent stroke and other thromboembolic complications. However, the combination of these two treatments, known as triple therapy, increases the risk of severe bleeding, with a negative prognostic impact. The use of direct anticoagulants, which reduce bleeding rates compared to warfarin, together with the maintenance of only one antiplatelet agent (P2Y12 inhibitors), known as dual therapy, may be a safer alternative in these patients. In this article, we reviewed several randomized studies comparing triple versus dual therapy, as well as meta-analyses with such studies, and the approaches suggested by the most recent guidelines, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of these treatments, in terms of safety and efficacy in this important and growing subgroup of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Centemero et al. (2021) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. Dual therapy (oral anticoagulant and P2Y12 inhibitor) vs. Triple therapy (oral anticoagulant, aspirin, and P2Y12 inhibitor) was evaluated on Major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (based on cited meta-analysis) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78, p=<0.0001). Dual therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant and a P2Y12 inhibitor significantly reduces bleeding compared to triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: