Key result
Measurement position affected the cardio-ankle vascular index, with the supine position yielding the lowest values compared to sitting, reclining, and standing positions.
Why the study?
Does measurement position affect the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in healthy males?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Does measurement position affect the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in healthy males?
Measurement position significantly affects the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), necessitating correction when measured in non-supine positions.
There is a need for new methods to measure the level of arterial stiffness easily at home. A previous report investigating the effect of measurement position on brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) showed that baPWV was higher in the sitting position than in the supine position. This was probably because the increased ankle PWV was associated with increased hydrostatic pressure in the arteries of lower extremities. Therefore, we investigated the effect of measurement position on the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), which is hardly affected by blood pressure. CAVI was measured in 50 healthy males (20–74 years) in five positions: supine, sitting, sitting with the knees flexed at 0[Formula: see text], reclining 50[Formula: see text], and standing. Compared to other positions, CAVI in the supine position was the lowest ([Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text] (the time difference between the second heart sound and the notch of the pulse wave in the upper arm) in the supine position was the highest ([Formula: see text]); and [Formula: see text] (the time difference between the minimum upper arm and ankle pulse wave pattern values) in the supine position was the highest ([Formula: see text]). Thus, our results indicated that changes in measurement position reduced pulse arrival time (increasing pulse wave velocity). We also observed a good correlation between CAVI in the supine position and that in other positions. The present study showed that the measurement position affected CAVI as much as it affected baPWV. Accordingly, correcting for the measurement position would be required when the position differs from supine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SHIMAWAKI et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=50). Non-supine measurement positions (sitting, reclining, standing) vs. Supine position was evaluated on Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). Measurement position affected the cardio-ankle vascular index, with the supine position yielding the lowest values compared to sitting, reclining, and standing positions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: