Key result
Aspirin use for secondary CVD prevention averages ~40% globally, with severe underuse in low-income countries.
Why the study?
To guide efforts to mitigate the global cardiovascular disease burden, understanding current levels of aspirin use for secondary prevention across countries is needed.
Cross-Sectional (n=124,505)
Yes
Aspirin is significantly underused for secondary cardiovascular prevention globally, particularly in low-income countries, highlighting a major gap in evidence-based cardiovascular care.
Suboptimal aspirin use for secondary CVD prevention signals a care gap; leaves open questions on access barriers in lower-income countries.
Importance: Aspirin is an effective and low-cost option for reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and improving mortality rates among individuals with established CVD. To guide efforts to mitigate the global CVD burden, there is a need to understand current levels of aspirin use for secondary prevention of CVD. Objective: To report and evaluate aspirin use for secondary prevention of CVD across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional analysis using pooled, individual participant data from nationally representative health surveys conducted between 2013 and 2020 in 51 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Included surveys contained data on self-reported history of CVD and aspirin use. The sample of participants included nonpregnant adults aged 40 to 69 years. Exposures: Countries' per capita income levels and world region; individuals' socioeconomic demographics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported use of aspirin for secondary prevention of CVD. Results: The overall pooled sample included 124 505 individuals. The median age was 52 (IQR, 45-59) years, and 50.5% (95% CI, 49.9%-51.1%) were women. A total of 10 589 individuals had a self-reported history of CVD (8.1% [95% CI, 7.6%-8.6%]). Among individuals with a history of CVD, aspirin use for secondary prevention in the overall pooled sample was 40.3% (95% CI, 37.6%-43.0%). By income group, estimates were 16.6% (95% CI, 12.4%-21.9%) in low-income countries, 24.5% (95% CI, 20.8%-28.6%) in lower-middle-income countries, 51.1% (95% CI, 48.2%-54.0%) in upper-middle-income countries, and 65.0% (95% CI, 59.1%-70.4%) in high-income countries. Conclusion and Relevance: Worldwide, aspirin is underused in secondary prevention, particularly in low-income countries. National health policies and health systems must develop, implement, and evaluate strategies to promote aspirin therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=124,505). Aspirin use was evaluated on Self-reported use of aspirin for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (95% CI 37.6%-43.0%). Among individuals with a self-reported history of cardiovascular disease across 51 countries, overall aspirin use for secondary prevention was 40.3%, ranging from 16.6% in low-income countries to 65.0% in high-income countries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: