Key result
Platelet hyperresponse linked to ~220% greater risk of postoperative hemorrhagic complications vs normoresponders.
Why the study?
The predictive utility of preoperative platelet-sensitivity testing for decreasing bleeding risk in patients undergoing endovascular neurointervention remains unclear.
Does platelet hyperresponse measured by VerifyNow predict postoperative hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing neuroendovascular surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,084)
Does platelet hyperresponse measured by VerifyNow predict postoperative hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing neuroendovascular surgery?
Relative Risk: 3.2
p-value: p=0.001
Platelet hyperresponse measured by the VerifyNow assay is a significant predictor of postoperative hemorrhagic complications in neuroendovascular surgery, though the optimal threshold remains undefined.
May warrant platelet function monitoring for hemorrhagic risk stratification in neuroendovascular procedures; leaves open whether adjustment improves outcomes.
Background Dual antiplatelet therapy is used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications in neuroendovascular surgery. However, the predictive utility of preoperative platelet-sensitivity testing for decreasing bleed risk in patients undergoing endovascular neurointervention remains unclear. Objective We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to illustrate the association between platelet response and risk of hemorrhagic complications from neuroendovascular surgery, examine the efficacy of the VerifyNow platelet reactivity unit (PRU) assay in predicting hemorrhagic outcomes, and assess whether a clinically useful threshold for platelet response can be defined to standardize guidelines. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Articles were screened for relevance by title and abstract, followed by full text. Results Of 735 resultant articles, 17 studies of 2084 patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention were included. Diagnoses included both intracranial and extracranial pathologies, of which 37.8% were treated with flow diversion, 22.4% with stent-assisted coil embolization, 14.3% with intracranial stenting, 12.8% with simple coil embolization, 5.8% with balloon-assisted coil embolization, 2.0% with extracranial stenting, and 4.8% with an alternate method. Precisely, 52.9% (9 out of 17) of studies determined platelet hyperresponse to be an independent predictor of postoperative hemorrhagic complications, with 11.8% (2 out of 17) of studies reporting a similar but non-statistically significant trend. 35.3% (6 out of 17) of studies found no relationship between platelet response and postoperative hemorrhagic complications. The estimated clinical threshold for PRU to prevent hemorrhagic complications varied considerably across studies (range: <46–118 PRU). Meta-analysis found platelet hyperresponse to have more than a 3-fold increased risk of hemorrhagic complications compared to normoresponders (relative risk = 3.2, p = 0.001). Conclusion Although this meta-analysis shows the predictive utility of the P2Y12 assay for postoperative hemorrhagic complications in neuroendovascular surgery, the optimal therapeutic threshold for minimizing bleeding risk is still uncertain. To better understand the utility of the P2Y12 assay in the perioperative period, further prospective research is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in neuroendovascular surgery (n=2,084). Platelet hyperresponse vs. Normoresponders was evaluated on postoperative hemorrhagic complications (RR 3.2, p=0.001). Platelet hyperresponse was associated with a more than 3-fold increased risk of postoperative hemorrhagic complications compared to normoresponders (RR 3.2, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: