Key result
Comprehensive STEMI protocol linked to eliminated sex disparities in in-hospital mortality, though female bleeding risk persisted.
Why the study?
To determine whether a comprehensive STEMI protocol is associated with reduced sex disparities over 5 years.
Does a comprehensive STEMI protocol reduce sex disparities in clinical outcomes for STEMI patients treated with PCI?
Cohort (n=1,833)
No
Does a comprehensive STEMI protocol reduce sex disparities in clinical outcomes for STEMI patients treated with PCI?
A comprehensive STEMI protocol was associated with sustained reductions in sex disparities for in-hospital ischemic outcomes, although higher bleeding rates in females persisted.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May narrow sex disparities in STEMI mortality; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Aims To determine whether a comprehensive ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) protocol is associated with reduced sex disparities over 5 years. Methods and results This was an observational cohort study of 1833 consecutive STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before (1 January 2011–14 July 2014, control group) and after (15 July 2014–15 July 2019, protocol group) implementation of a protocol for early guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), rapid door to balloon time (D2BT), and use of trans-radial PCI. In the control group, females had less GDMT (77.1% vs. 68.1%, P = 0.03), similarly low trans-radial PCI (19.0% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.73), and longer D2BT [104 min (79, 133) vs. 112 min (85, 147), P = 0.02] corresponding to higher in-hospital mortality [4.5% vs. 10.3%, odds ratio (OR) 2.44 (1.34–4.46), P = 0.004], major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE, 9.8% vs. 16.3%, OR 1.79 (1.14–2.84), P = 0.01], and net adverse clinical events [NACE, 16.1% vs. 28.3%, OR 2.06 (1.42–2.99), P < 0.001]. In the protocol group, no significant sex differences were observed in GDMT (87.2% vs. 86.4%, P = 0.81) or D2BT [85 min (64–106) vs. 89 min (65–111), P = 0.06], but trans-radial PCI was used less in females (77.6% vs. 71.2%, P = 0.03). In-hospital mortality [2.5% vs. 4.4%, OR 1.78 (0.91–3.51), P = 0.09] and MACCE [9.0% vs. 11.1%, OR 1.27 (0.83–1.92), P = 0.26] were similar between sexes, but higher NACE in females approached significance [14.8% vs. 19.4%, OR 1.38 (0.99–1.92), P = 0.05] due to higher bleeding risk [7.2% vs. 11.1%, OR 1.60 (1.04–2.46), P = 0.03]. Conclusions A comprehensive STEMI protocol was associated with sustained reductions for in-hospital ischaemic outcomes over 5 years, but higher bleeding rates in females persisted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huded et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=1,833). Female sex (under comprehensive STEMI protocol) vs. Male sex was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.91-3.51, p=0.09). Implementation of a comprehensive STEMI protocol was associated with the elimination of significant sex disparities for in-hospital mortality, though higher bleeding rates in females persisted.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: