Key result
The ECG2CDM algorithm demonstrated a superior conversion accuracy of 99.94% for mapping automated 12-lead ECG interpretations to OMOP CDM vocabulary compared to existing similarity and rule-based methods.
Why the study?
Existing CDM conversion tools require manual validation, cannot extract multiple concepts, and inadequately remove noise when standardizing computerized 12-lead ECG diagnostic statements across different interpretation algorithms.
Does the ECG2CDM algorithm improve the accuracy of converting automated 12-lead ECG interpretations to OMOP CDM vocabulary compared to single-method algorithms?
Does the ECG2CDM algorithm improve the accuracy of converting automated 12-lead ECG interpretations to OMOP CDM vocabulary compared to single-method algorithms?
Absolute Event Rate: 99.94% vs 97.81%
The ECG2CDM algorithm achieved 99.9% accuracy in automatically converting heterogeneous 12-lead ECG diagnostic statements into standardized OMOP CDM vocabulary, facilitating large-scale interoperable data analysis.
BACKGROUND: A computerized 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can automatically generate diagnostic statements, which are helpful for clinical purposes. Standardization is required for big data analysis when using ECG data generated by different interpretation algorithms. The common data model (CDM) is a standard schema designed to overcome heterogeneity between medical data. Diagnostic statements usually contain multiple CDM concepts and also include non-essential noise information, which should be removed during CDM conversion. Existing CDM conversion tools have several limitations, such as the requirement for manual validation, inability to extract multiple CDM concepts, and inadequate noise removal. OBJECTIVES: We aim to develop a fully automated text data conversion algorithm that overcomes limitations of existing tools and manual conversion. METHODS: We used interpretations printed by 12-lead resting ECG tests from three different vendors: GE Medical Systems, Philips Medical Systems, and Nihon Kohden. For automatic mapping, we first constructed an ontology-lexicon of ECG interpretations. After clinical coding, an optimized tool for converting ECG interpretation to CDM terminology is developed using term-based text processing. RESULTS: Using the ontology-lexicon, the cosine similarity-based algorithm and rule-based hierarchical algorithm showed comparable conversion accuracy (97.8 and 99.6%, respectively), while an integrated algorithm based on a heuristic approach, ECG2CDM, demonstrated superior performance (99.9%) for datasets from three major vendors. CONCLUSION: We developed a user-friendly software that runs the ECG2CDM algorithm that is easy to use even if the user is not familiar with CDM or medical terminology. We propose that automated algorithms can be helpful for further big data analysis with an integrated and standardized ECG dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2022) studied ECG diagnostic statements (n=142,506). ECG2CDM algorithm vs. Cosine Similarity and Rule-based Similarity algorithms was evaluated on Conversion accuracy for mapping automated 12-lead ECG interpretations to OMOP CDM vocabulary (95% CI 0.9994-0.9994). The ECG2CDM algorithm demonstrated a superior conversion accuracy of 99.94% for mapping automated 12-lead ECG interpretations to OMOP CDM vocabulary compared to existing similarity and rule-based methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: