Explores antifibrotic effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in liver fibrosis, indicating potential for treatment.
Liver fibrosis is a central pathological process driving the progression of chronic liver disease, yet effective antifibrotic therapies remain limited. Increasing evidence has identified the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a ligand-activated nuclear receptor, as a key regulator of intrahepatic homeostasis and fibrogenesis. MR is expressed across multiple hepatic cell types, including hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells, macrophages, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, where it integrates metabolic, inflammatory, and microvascular signaling. Under pathological conditions, MR activation—mediated by both aldosterone-dependent and ligand-independent mechanisms such as hypoxia and oxidative stress—amplifies core profibrotic pathways, including TGF-β signaling, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and NF-κB–driven inflammation. These molecular mechanisms are executed in a cell-type–specific manner, promoting hepatic stellate cell activation, macrophage-mediated inflammation, hepatocyte metabolic dysfunction, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cell capillarization, thereby forming a self-reinforcing fibrogenic network. Preclinical studies consistently demonstrate that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists attenuate fibrosis by targeting these interconnected pathways. However, clinical evidence remains limited, with only early-phase trials in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and indirect support from cardiorenal studies. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, particularly finerenone, exhibit improved receptor selectivity and safety profiles, highlighting their therapeutic potential. Future research should focus on disease-specific patient stratification, validated antifibrotic endpoints, and rigorous safety evaluation to enable effective clinical translation of MR-targeted therapies in liver fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
郑怀军 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: