Evaluates baloxavir marboxil efficacy against HPAI A(H7N9) in macaques, suggesting early intervention is crucial.
BACKGROUND: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H7N9) virus poses a potential public health threat, underscoring the need for effective antiviral options for outbreak preparedness. Baloxavir marboxil (BXM) is a cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor approved for seasonal influenza, but its in vivo efficacy against HPAI A(H7N9) virus has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of BXM in cynomolgus macaques infected with a reverse genetics-generated HPAI A(H7N9) virus. Animals received either low- or high-dose BXM, single-dose oseltamivir, or vehicle at 4 or 48 h post-infection (hpi). BXM administration was designed to mimic human pharmacokinetics. Viral titres, body temperature, body weight, lung pathology, and treatment-emergent viral substitutions were analysed. FINDINGS: Early treatment (4 hpi) with BXM significantly reduced viral titres in nasal and tracheal swabs, lessened weight loss, and decreased pulmonary inflammation and alveolar damage compared to untreated or oseltamivir-treated animals. Virus pathogenicity was relatively mild; no animals died. Delayed treatment (48 hpi) showed limited benefit. The PA-I38T (83.8%) and PA-E23G (78.6%) substitutions associated with BXM resistance were detected in one animal, and a PA-K34R (85.4%) substitution was detected in another animal. These substitutions reduce BXM susceptibility and were detected at low titres. INTERPRETATION: Although the dosing regimen used in this study involved repeat dosing to achieve the plasma drug concentrations after a single dose in humans, these findings highlight the importance of early antiviral intervention and support BXM use as a potential countermeasure against HPAI A(H7N9) virus infection, as resistance-associated substitutions remained limited in the macaque model. BXM may be a valuable therapeutic option for HPAI A(H7N9) virus infections. FUNDING: Supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP20wm0125002, JP223fa627001) and Shionogi & Co., Ltd.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwatsuki‐Horimoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: