Evaluates cement and guar gum mixture effectiveness on soil strength, indicating promising results for infrastructure.
Saline-affected soils exhibit poor mechanical properties and are prone to durability degradation under environmental disturbances, severely hindering infrastructure development in saline-affected regions. This study adopted a synergistic consolidation treatment for sulfate-salinized soils using a guar gum (GG) and Portland cement composite system, formulating 25 mix designs with GG content ranging from 0% to 2% and cement content from 0% to 12%. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS), dry–wet cycle durability, and repeated load fatigue performance of the stabilized soils were systematically tested. Combined with microstructural characterization techniques including X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and CT scanning, the evolution patterns of the solidified soil’s mechanical properties and the macro-micro interaction mechanisms were revealed. Results indicate that cement is the primary strength source in cement-stabilized soil: at a cement dosage of 12%, the UCS reaches 2.53 MPa, a 41-fold increase compared to the native soil. A significant synergistic strengthening effect exists between cement and GG at the optimal GG dosage of 0.5%–1.0%, with the optimal mixture ratio being 6%–9% cement blended with 0.5%–1.0% GG. With this optimized ratio, the stabilized soil shows a strength retention rate of 87.2% after 10 dry–wet cycles, and its fatigue life extends to 1986 cycles (a 42.6% increase compared to pure cement-stabilized specimens). Microstructural analysis suggests that the stabilization process is fundamentally governed by interfacial micro-coating mechanisms. The reaction between cement aluminates and soil sulfates generates abundant ettringite, which is hypothesized to form a rigid skeletal framework. Simultaneously, GG forms a hydrogel network that acts as a dense, protective organic–inorganic micro-coating on the surface of soil aggregates and cement phases. This interfacial encapsulation optimizes the pore structure, reducing porosity to 1.43% and fundamentally blocking inward water infiltration pathways at the aggregate interface. However, excessive GG (>1.5%) coats cement particles, hinders hydration reactions and induces structural defects, ultimately leading to performance degradation. This study elucidates the macro-micro coupled mechanism of GG-cement composite consolidation for saline–alkali soils, providing theoretical foundations and technical solutions for saline–alkali soil consolidation engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: