In vitro study compares root dentin thickness after using manual and rotary file systems in primary molars, suggesting similar effectiveness.
Background Remaining Root Dentin Thickness (RRDT) after root canal instrumentation is an important parameter to be assessed with newer file systems. This study aimed to evaluate the root dentin thickness following instrumentation of primary molar root canals using manual or pediatric rotary file systems. Methods Fifty-one extracted human primary molars were prepared with access cavity preparation and working length determination. Preliminary Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were obtained with specimens mounted on vinyl polysiloxane templates. Root dentin thickness was measured at three predetermined levels. 51 mesiobuccal canals were randomly divided into 3 groups of 17 each. After instrumentation using the allocated file system i.e. Group 1 - Manual K files; Group 2 - Kedo SG Blue and Group 3 - Kedo S Square rotary files, CBCT images of the specimens were obtained. The remaining root dentin thickness was obtained using measurements of pre-and post-instrumentation CBCT. Data was analysed using paired t-test for intragroup comparisons. Intergroup comparison of RRDT was done using ANOVA. Results The Remaining Root Dentin Thickness (RRDT) after instrumentation did not differ significantly among the three study groups at the three predetermined levels ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Kedo S Square and Kedo SG Blue file systems showed comparable effectiveness to the manual K file system in the instrumentation of mesiobuccal canals of primary molars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: