Comparative analysis explores social trust sources in transboundary water cooperation, suggesting its impact hinges on institutional arrangements.
Trust is often cited as a key factor enabling transboundary water cooperation, yet it remains insufficiently explored empirically. This paper explores how social trust operates and why it does not always translate into effective cooperation. Focusing on data sharing, it compares the Sava and Syrdarya basins. Through interviews and participant observation, the analysis identifies seven sources of social trust. Although these facilitate interaction, trust alone is insufficient. Its impact depends on institutional arrangements that stabilize expectations and translate trust into coordinated action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bota Sharipova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: