Scoping review assesses cultural safety in rehabilitation interventions for Indigenous adults and caregivers, indicating significant gaps.
Purpose Indigenous peoples experience disproportionately high rates of chronic illness alongside persistent systemic barriers to accessing healthcare. These inequities underscore the need for rehabilitation interventions that are culturally safe for Indigenous adults living with chronic conditions. This study aimed to assess the extent to which rehabilitation interventions for Indigenous adults with chronic conditions, and their caregivers, demonstrate cultural safety. Specifically, we examined whether interventions addressed six cultural safety themes [1]: collaboration and partnership [2]; power sharing [3]; consideration of the broader life context [4]; creation of a safe environment [5]; organizational and individual self-reflection; and [6] healthcare practitioner training.Materials and Methods A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Articles describing rehabilitation interventions for Indigenous adults with chronic conditions and/or caregivers were identified and analyzed using descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis.Results Twenty-seven articles describing 22 unique interventions met inclusion criteria. Only one intervention addressed all six cultural safety themes. On average, interventions addressed 3.2 ± 1.62 themes, and only one publication included family caregivers.Conclusions Findings reveal a significant cultural safety gap in rehabilitation care for Indigenous adults with chronic conditions. Future interventions should explicitly integrate cultural safety frameworks and meaningfully involve caregivers in intervention development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Premnazeer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: