What does this research mean for the field?

Integrating an emergency medicine-trained critical care fellow into the emergency department to manage boarding ICU patients improves staff satisfaction and demonstrates billing feasibility, but does not significantly alter patient outcomes such as length of stay or discharge disposition. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This evaluation focuses on the impact of an emergency medicine-trained anesthesiology critical care fellow on the care of ICU patients boarding in the emergency department.

June 28, 2026Open Access

Enhancing Care for Critically Ill Patients Boarding in the Emergency Department: A 360° Evaluation of an Emergency Medicine Critical Care Fellow Model

Key Points

This evaluation focuses on the impact of an emergency medicine-trained anesthesiology critical care fellow on the care of ICU patients boarding in the emergency department.
Mixed methods observational study at a single urban tertiary care center
Deploying a second-year EM ACC fellow in the ED for 2 months
Conducting a 360° analysis including staff surveys, fellow productivity, and retrospective cohort analysis of patient outcomes.
Fellows worked 26 shifts, managing 101 ICU boarding patients
91.5% of medical professionals found the EM ACC fellow invaluable or very helpful
No significant differences in ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, or discharge disposition were observed.

Abstract

Objectives Evaluate the impact of an emergency medicine-trained anesthesiology critical care (EM ACC) fellow on the delivery of critical care to patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and boarding in the emergency department (ED). Methods This is a mixed methods observational study at a single urban tertiary care center. A second year EM ACC fellow was deployed to the ED for 2 months. We performed a 360° analysis of this pilot program using a cross-sectional staff survey, an analysis of fellow productivity, and a secondary retrospective cohort analysis of patient outcomes. Results Fellows worked a total of 26 shifts and encountered 101 ICU boarding patients. Surveys were completed by 71 medical professionals: 22 emergency medicine (EM) physicians, 44 EM nurses, and 5 critical care (CC) physicians (n = 107, response rate 66.4%). On a 5-point Likert scale, the EM ACC fellow was reported to be invaluable or very helpful by 91.5% of all respondents. Qualitative analysis of open feedback emphasized improved team communication, coordination of care, timely interventions, and enhanced CC education. Fellows generated 3.1 work relative value unit (wRVU) per hour and 4.9 wRVU per patient while facilitating 11 (10.8%) ICU downgrades and 4 (3.9%) ICU upgrades. There were no significant differences in patient outcomes (ICU length of stay LOS, hospital LOS, and discharge disposition). Conclusion This model, using an EM ACC fellow, offers an approach to improve the delivery of CC to ICU patients boarding in the ED and may be modified to fit the resources, needs, and models available at different institutions. At the study institution, integrating EM ACC fellows into the ED garnered widespread support and demonstrated billing feasibility, but did not show difference in patient outcomes.

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a40ba2161bb0a67205c6166 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100444

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper