Retrospective analysis reports the impact of homologous recombination status on PARP inhibitor efficacy in advanced ovarian cancer, indicating crucial treatment insights.
Objective Evaluating homologous recombination (HR) status is essential for determining the efficacy of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers. However, data from Taiwan remains limited. This study reports preliminary findings on HR status evaluation and PARPi treatment outcomes. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer at a single institute between January 2021 and January 2024. HR status was assessed using ACT or Sofiva Genomics under the CareHRD Project in Taiwan. The safety and efficacy of PARPi were evaluated, and Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses identified factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among 128 patients, 30 (23.4%) were BRCA m, 28 (21.9%) were HRd/ BRCA wt, 31 (24.2%) were HRp, and 39 (30.5%) had unknown HR/ BRCA wt status. A total of 43 patients received PARPi (29 BRCA m, 12 HRd/ BRCA wt, 1 HRp, 1 unknown HR/ BRCA wt). Full-dose PARPi was initiated in 32 patients (74.4%), with 22 (51.2%) requiring dose adjustments. At a median follow-up of 25.5 months, PARPi maintenance significantly improved PFS, with median PFS not reached versus 12.2 months in non-users (HR 0.332, 95% CI 0.184–0.589). Three-year PFS was 57.2% vs 22.2%. In the HRd-positive subgroup, PARPi use also prolonged PFS ( p = 0.006), with multivariate analysis confirming a 74% reduction in progression risk (HR 0.256, 95% CI 0.085–0.771). Conclusions The HRd rate in this Taiwanese cohort aligns with existing literature. PARPi significantly improved survival in HRd patients, but adverse events necessitate careful hematological monitoring for treatment sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: