What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to compare Korean and international gross examination reporting guidelines for various cancers to identify standardization needs.

Standardization of Gross Examination in Histopathology: A Literature-based Comparative Review of Domestic and International Reporting Guidelines

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This study aims to compare Korean and international gross examination reporting guidelines for various cancers to identify standardization needs.
Examined reporting structure, essential items, standardization level, and data extractability from Korean and international guidelines.
Focused on guidelines for gastric, colorectal, lung, liver, and breast cancers.
Analyzed the completeness and efficiency of structured versus free-text reporting formats.
International reporting systems showed higher standardization, enhancing data reproducibility and utilization.
Korean practices displayed core similarities but exhibited variability in reporting.
Structured reporting significantly improved data completeness and extraction efficiency compared to free-text formats.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Literature-based review compares Korean and international gross examination reporting guidelines, suggesting improvements for consistency.

LEE et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Literature-based review compares Korean and international gross examination reporting guidelines, suggesting improvements for consistency.