Literature review demonstrates how organizations can balance growth and sustainability by identifying enabling conditions.
The growth‐driven economic paradigm is increasingly criticized for its ecological and social unsustainability, yet organizations remain embedded in systems that structurally depend on growth. This creates a persistent tension between growth dependencies and sustainability aspirations. This study examines how organizations can navigate this tension by identifying the conditions that enable growth moderation while sustaining the provision of goods and services. We conduct a systematic literature review combining keyword searches and snowballing and integrate a descriptive mapping of the field with an inductive content analysis. The mapping reveals a recent, heterogeneous, and critically oriented literature, marked by blind spots in managerial, policy, and institutional perspectives. The inductive analysis identifies and structures 28 enabling conditions across paradigmatic, sectoral, organizational, and actor levels. Building on these findings, we develop a four‐part research agenda that calls for systemic regime‐level analysis, configurational and cross‐level studies, explicit engagement with tensions and trade‐offs, and broader empirical investigation. The study provides a structured foundation for advancing research on organizational growth moderation beyond growth‐dependent models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dethier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: