Investigates insecticide resistance related to genetic mutations in Anopheles sinensis, suggesting the need for comprehensive resistance management strategies.
The relationship between phenotypic resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides and the frequencies of knockdown resistance ( kdr ) and acetylcholinesterase ( ace-1 ) target-site mutations was investigated in four field strains of Anopheles sinensis collected from high-malaria-risk areas in the Republic of Korea (ROK). Six kdr genotypes and six ace-1 genotypes were identified, and the overall frequencies of resistance-associated mutations ranged from 62.1% to 96.8% for kdr and from 84.5% to 100% for ace-1 . Among larvae that survived exposure to LC 50 concentrations of selected insecticides, resistance-associated genotypes, including Phe-Phe (TTT) in kdr and Gly (GGR)-Ser (YGC) in ace-1 , were predominantly detected. Although the mean frequency of ace-1 resistance-associated mutations was higher than that of kdr mutations, the difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.42). In contrast, bioassay results showed that the mean resistance levels to pyrethroids were significantly higher than those to organophosphates ( P = 0.006). Correlation analyses revealed no statistically significant association between kdr mutation frequency and pyrethroid resistance or between ace-1 mutation frequency and organophosphate resistance. These findings suggest that resistance-associated target-site mutations are widespread in An. sinensis populations from high-malaria-risk areas near the DMZ, but their frequencies alone do not fully explain phenotypic resistance levels. Therefore, while molecular data are useful for monitoring the distribution of resistance-associated mutations, they should be interpreted alongside bioassay results when developing insecticide resistance management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: