Randomized trial evaluates tasipimidine effects on anxiety and recovery in dogs undergoing ovariectomy, suggesting improved welfare.
Preoperative anxiety may compromise perioperative welfare and anesthetic management in dogs. This randomized, blind clinical study evaluated the effects of oral tasipimidine on anxiety-related behaviors, handling quality, cardiovascular variables, anesthetic requirements and recovery in dogs undergoing elective ovariectomy. Thirty ASA I dogs were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Treatment groups received tasipimidine (30 µg/kg PO) 45 min before admission, followed by morphine (0.3 mg/kg IM) combined with dexmedetomidine at either 2.5 µg/kg (GTa) or 5 µg/kg IM (GTb). Control dogs (GC) received an oral placebo followed by dexmedetomidine (5 µg/kg IM) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg IM). Anxiety was assessed using the Clinic Dog Stress Scale (CDSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Reactivity Evaluation Form (REF). Handling quality was assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and recovery quality using the Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS). Tasipimidine significantly reduced anxiety-related behaviors compared with controls, with lower CDSS (5 [0–10] vs. 13 [3–19]), VAS (4 [2–7] vs. 6.5 [2–9]), and REF scores (1 [1–3] vs. 2 [1–4]) (p < 0.05). Handling quality improved significantly in treated dogs with lower NRS (1 [1–2] vs. 2 [1–4]; p = 0.003). Preoperative heart rate was lower in tasipimidine-treated dogs (85 ± 19 bpm) than in controls (127 ± 23 bpm; p < 0.001). Recovery agitation requiring dexmedetomidine rescue sedation occurred in 30% of treated dogs versus 60% of controls. Propofol and fentanyl requirements did not differ significantly among groups (p > 0.05). Tasipimidine improved anxiety-related behavioral scores and handling quality in dogs; however, its cardiovascular effects and perioperative role warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cambeiro-Camarero et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: