Key result
Fontan fenestration is linked to shorter LOS, with a 3-day reduction when mPAP ≥13 mm Hg.
Why the study?
Utilization of Fontan fenestration varies considerably by center, prompting evaluation of factors associated with its use and its impact on postoperative length of stay.
Does Fontan fenestration reduce postoperative length of stay in pediatric patients undergoing Fontan surgery?
Cohort (n=702)
Yes
Does Fontan fenestration reduce postoperative length of stay in pediatric patients undergoing Fontan surgery?
p-value: p=0.0024
Fontan fenestration is associated with shorter postoperative length of stay, particularly in patients with preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥13 mm Hg.
Substantial center variation in fenestration use persists; leaves open optimal application in contemporary Fontan surgery.
Utilization of Fontan fenestration varies considerably by center. Using a multicenter Pediatric Heart Network dataset linking surgical and preoperative hemodynamic variables, the authors evaluated factors associated with use of Fontan fenestration and the impact of fenestration on post-Fontan length of stay (LOS). Patients 2 to 6 years old at Fontan surgery from 2010 to 2020 with catheterization <1 year prior were included. Factors associated with fenestration were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for key covariates. Restrictive cubic spline analysis was used to evaluate potential cut-points for hemodynamic variables associated with longer postoperative LOS stratified by fenestration with multivariable linear regression to evaluate the magnitude of effect. Fenestration was used in 465 of 702 patients (66.2%). Placement of a fenestration was associated with center (range 27%-93% use, P < 0.0001) and Fontan type (OR: 14.1 for lateral tunnel vs extracardiac conduit, P < 0.0001). No hemodynamic variable was independently associated with fenestration. In a multivariable linear model adjusting for center, a center-fenestration interaction, prematurity, preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), and cardiac index, fenestration was associated with shorter hospital LOS after Fontan (P = 0.0024). The benefit was most pronounced at mPAP ≥13 mm Hg (median LOS: 9 vs 12 days, P = 0.001). There is wide center variability in use of Fontan fenestration that is not explained by preoperative hemodynamics. Fenestration is independently associated with shorter LOS, and those with mPAP ≥13 mm Hg at pre-Fontan catheterization benefit the most. We propose this threshold as minimal criteria for fenestration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hill et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Fontan surgery (n=702). Fontan fenestration vs. No fenestration was evaluated on post-Fontan length of stay (LOS) (p=0.0024). Fontan fenestration was independently associated with shorter postoperative length of stay (P=0.0024), with the greatest benefit in patients with preoperative mPAP ≥13 mm Hg (9 vs 12 days; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: