Key result
Ablation plus LAAC linked to ~90% less stroke/TIA vs ablation in AF and HFpEF.
Why the study?
Further investigation of the safety and long-term efficacy of combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure was warranted in patients with HFpEF.
Does combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure reduce ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with atrial fibrillation and HFpEF compared to ablation alone?
Cohort (n=331)
No
Does combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure reduce ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with atrial fibrillation and HFpEF compared to ablation alone?
In patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and HFpEF, combining left atrial appendage closure with catheter ablation significantly reduces long-term risks of ischemic stroke and major bleeding without increasing heart failure rehospitalizations compared to ablation alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for combined ablation-LAAC in AF-HFpEF; prospective RCTs needed before practice change.
Background In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), further investigation of the safety and long-term efficacy of combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure (RF + LAAC) in patients with HFpEF is warranted. Methods In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome of RF + LAAC in patients with AF and HFpEF, compared to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF) alone. 331 patients with AF and chronic HFpEF were divided into two groups: RF + LAAC ( n = 196) and RF ( n = 135). After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 96 matched pairs were enrolled in further analysis. HF rehospitalization, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and major bleeding events were assessed over 24 months. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to compare outcomes. Results The RF + LAAC group demonstrated comparable procedural complication rates to RF alone (5.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.733). The risks of ischemic stroke/TIA (ARR=4.95%, HR = 0.096, 95%CI:0.012–0.753, p = 0.026) and major bleeding events (ARR=3.91%, HR = 0.120, 95%CI: 0.015–0.957, p = 0.045) were significantly lower in RF + LAAC group vs. RF alone, while HF rehospitalization was similar between the two groups (ARR=−0.56%, HR = 1.356, 95%CI: 0.303–6.059, p = 0.690). Conclusions In patients with AF and HFpEF, combined RF + LAAC was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke/TIA and major bleeding, without an observed increase in HF rehospitalization, compared with RF alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Che et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=331). Combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure (RF + LAAC) vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF) alone was evaluated on Ischemic stroke/TIA (HR 0.096, 95% CI 0.012-0.753, p=0.026). Combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke or TIA (HR 0.096) compared to ablation alone in patients with AF and HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: