Key result
Redo valve-sparing root replacement (David I procedure) was successfully performed in a patient with severe pulmonary autograft dilatation 21 years after a Ross procedure, resulting in mild aortic regurgitation at 1-year follow-up.
Why the study?
Late pulmonary autograft dilatation occurs in 10-20 % of patients after the Ross procedure, and valve-sparing root replacement avoids lifelong anticoagulation and prosthetic valve complications.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Redo valve-sparing root replacement (David I procedure) is a viable surgical option for late pulmonary autograft dilatation with unaffected valve leaflets following a Ross procedure.
Supports redo valve-sparing root replacement for late autograft dilatation after Ross; leaves open durability and generalizability.
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Late pulmonary autograft dilatation is observed in 10-20 % of patients after the Ross procedure, more often during the second decade of follow-up. Composite aortic root replacement with a valved conduit is the most common redo procedure. An aortic valve-sparing root replacement does not require lifelong anticoagulation and may significantly decrease the risk of complications, associated with a valve prosthesis. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a case of late pulmonary autograft dilatation developed after the Ross procedure. The annual transthoracic echocardiography after 20 years revealed severe dilatation of the pulmonary autograft, measuring 60 mm in diameter. The patient underwent a successful elective redo valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure). The aortic cross-clamp time was 144 min, and the CPB time was 181 min. The patient had an uneventful midterm postoperative course. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Late pulmonary autograft failure after the Ross procedure is a relatively rare condition, leading to repeat operation. Late autograft failure can contribute to aortic regurgitation, heart failure, and death due to ascending aortic dissection and rupture. Several research groups reported good early and midterm results of redo valve-sparing root replacement in such cases. In a reoperative valve-sparing root replacement after the Ross procedure, the portion of the native aorta with the adjacent part of the autograft may complicate the aortic root proper sizing. CONCLUSION: Redo valve-sparing root replacement (David I procedure) is a viable option in pulmonary autograft dilatation with unaffected valve leaflets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uspenskiy et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Late pulmonary autograft dilatation after the Ross procedure (n=1). Redo valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure) was evaluated on Postoperative outcome and aortic regurgitation. Redo valve-sparing root replacement (David I procedure) was successfully performed in a patient with severe pulmonary autograft dilatation 21 years after a Ross procedure, resulting in mild aortic regurgitation at 1-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: