Key result
This review summarizes evidence on prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy or antiplatelet plus anticoagulant therapy versus lower intensity strategies in patients with concomitant PAD and CAD.
Why the study?
Patients with both PAD and CAD have high residual risk for MACE and MALE, but the optimal antithrombotic therapy intensity in the post-acute and long-term setting remains debated given increased bleeding.
Does higher intensity antithrombotic therapy reduce MACE and MALE in patients with chronic PAD and CAD?
Does higher intensity antithrombotic therapy reduce MACE and MALE in patients with chronic PAD and CAD?
Intensified antithrombotic therapy with prolonged DAPT or aspirin plus an anticoagulant may offer cardiovascular and limb benefits in patients with concomitant PAD and CAD, though careful patient selection is required due to increased bleeding risk.
Tailored antithrombotic intensity may balance ischemic benefit against bleeding in chronic atherosclerotic disease; extends RCT evidence to guide personalized decisions.
Despite evidence-based therapies, patients presenting with atherosclerosis involving more than one vascular bed, such as those with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), constitute a particular vulnerable group characterized by enhanced residual long-term risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as major adverse limb events (MALE). The latter are progressively emerging as a hard outcome to be targeted, being correlated with increased mortality. Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of secondary prevention in both patients with PAD or CAD however, the optimal intensity of such therapy is still topic of debate, particularly in the post-acute and long-term setting. Recent well powered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have provided data in favor of a more intense antithrombotic therapy, such as prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor or a therapy with aspirin combined with an anticoagulant drug. Both approaches increase bleeding and patients selection is a key issue. The aim of this review is therefore to discuss and summarize the most updated available evidences for different strategies of anti-thrombotic therapies in patients with chronic PAD and CAD, particularly focusing on studies enrolling patients with both type of atherosclerotic disease and comparing a higher versus a lower intensity antithrombotic strategy. The final objective is to identify the optimal tailored approach in this setting, to achieve the greatest cardiovascular benefit and improving precision medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnani et al. (2023) conducted a review in Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or antiplatelet plus anticoagulant therapy vs. Lower intensity antithrombotic strategy was evaluated. This review summarizes evidence on prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy or antiplatelet plus anticoagulant therapy versus lower intensity strategies in patients with concomitant PAD and CAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: