PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a rapid needle-out patient-rollover time approach on the rate of pneumothorax after computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients gave written informed consent. Between January 2008 and December 2009, percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy was performed in 201 patients. Eighty-one biopsies were performed without (group 1) and 120 were performed with (group 2) a rapid needle-out patient-rollover time approach (defined as the time between removal of the biopsy needle and placing the patient biopsy-side down). Multivariate analysis was performed between groups for risk factors for pneumothorax, including patient demographic characteristics, lesion characteristics, and biopsy technique. RESULTS: Mean rapid needle-out patient-rollover time (± standard deviation) was 9.5 seconds ± 4.8. Seventy-six percent of patients (75 of 98) achieved a needle-out patient-rollover time of 10 seconds or less. Unsuitability for the rapid needle-out patient-rollover time technique resulted in exclusion of 1.8% of patients. An increased number of pneumothoraces (25 [37%] vs 22 [23%]; P = .04) and an increased number of drainage catheter insertions were noted in group 1 compared with group 2 (10 [15%] versus four [4%], respectively; P = .029). At multiple regression analysis for group 1, lesion size and emphysema along the needle track were independent risk factors for pneumothorax (P = .032 and .021, respectively), and emphysema along the needle track was an independent predictor for insertion of a drainage catheter (P = .005). No independent predictor was identified for pneumothorax or insertion of a drainage catheter in group 2. CONCLUSION: Rapid needle-out patient-rollover time during percutaneous CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy reduces the rate of overall pneumothorax and pneumothorax necessitating a drainage catheter. Use of this technique attenuates the influence of traditional risk factors for pneumothorax.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Neill et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: