Demonstrates AI's efficacy in causal attribution for construction supply chain disruptions, indicating significant efficiency gains.
Conventional causal attribution for disruptions in construction supply chains relies heavily on expert judgment and is therefore time-consuming. To address this limitation, artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising alternative. This study aims to: (1) develop and validate an AI-enhanced methodology for causal attribution in construction supply chain disruptions; (2) identify and analyze both direct and indirect causes of such disruptions; and (3) assess the practical efficacy of the proposed method. To achieve these objectives, a dataset was constructed from safety-related logistics accident reports issued in China. A large language model (LLM) was fine-tuned on this dataset and subsequently validated. The findings indicate that the fine-tuned model achieved a direct cause F1 score of 0.654 and an indirect cause F1 score of 0.525 on the test set, representing a significant improvement over the base model’s performance. Furthermore, a case study was deployed on a web-based system that generated interpretable causal analyses within 24 s, demonstrating a substantial efficiency gain compared to manual expert investigations. This study makes threefold contributions. Theoretically, it advances supply chain disruption management by proposing a dynamic diagnostic framework that shifts from static risk cataloging to causal mechanism analysis. Methodologically, it develops and validates an efficient domain-adaptation pipeline for LLMs, supported by a novel open-source dataset. Practically, it delivers a minute-level diagnostic tool that reduces analysis time from weeks to seconds, demonstrating significant potential for industry adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: