Introduces a theory on the evolving cost structure in organizational knowledge work due to generative AI, suggesting implications for role design and governance.
Generative AI shifts the cost structure of organizational knowledge work asymmetrically across an artifact's layers. The structural substrate – the typed graph of propositions, dependencies, and evidence anchors – becomes cheap to construct, verify, and recombine; the cohort-conditional prose rendering does not, and may grow costlier. This paper introduces the Operator: a role-level abstraction with intrinsic structural-substrate and judgment operations, whose human-versus-AI projection composition varies by era. The role-as-projection move extends the automation-augmentation paradox from task allocation to role-level division of operations. Two propositions follow. P1 (separability): structural substrate and rendering are independently optimizable. P4 (rendering-equivalence under spine-preservation): two renderings of a locked substrate converge on conclusions if and only if both preserve its structural elements, under a faithful extraction axiom. The paper illustrates the framework on a management-theory twin pair (dynamic capabilities) and applies it reflexively to its own production. Empirical estimation of two further predictions about recombination and cost-asymmetry parameters is reserved for a companion paper that extends the validation set across Russian and Chinese with five LLMs from three training-corpus families spanning proprietary APIs and open-weights local deployment, with extractor-invariant preservation verdicts. Three Design Propositions follow for organizational governance, role and incentive design, and editorial-process decoupling. Includes zharnikov-2026ao-spec-based-research-post-ai.yaml (Paper Spec v0.1.0) – a machine-readable specification of the paper's claims, assumptions, and dependencies. The paper's full machine-first bundle (the SPINE claim/dependency graph and the ONTOLOGY term module) lives in the public repository; see https://github.com/spectralbranding/paper-spec for the standard. This PDF is generated programmatically from that machine-first source under a research-as-repository model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmitry Zharnikov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: