Randomized trial tests perceptual interference in AI observers using brand portfolios, suggesting awareness is insufficient alone.
Brand portfolio theory predicts perceptual interference when observers recognize shared corporate ownership, requiring only an open awareness gate. Large language models (LLMs), whose training data permanently saturate this gate, provide a critical test. This paper formalizes spectral interference across eight perceptual dimensions and tests three propositions in a fully crossed experiment with 13 LLMs from seven training traditions, 40 brands, seven portfolio archetypes, and four prompt modalities (N = 9,925). Using the Dimensional Concentration Index and two-one-sided equivalence tests, the results reveal near-zero portfolio-induced change (mean \(||\) = .26; equivalence holds for 18/20 brands). Variance decomposition attributes .1% of perceptual concentration to portfolio framing versus 37.4% to brand identity. The sole exception occurs in multi-turn conversation for a reverse-aspiration structure (Geely Auto, d = -1.11), where extended context converts coordination information into output inferences. These results resolve the awareness-gate paradox: awareness is necessary but insufficient. A bandwidth constraint rooted in rate-distortion theory and rational inattention is also required. General-purpose LLMs are rationally inattentive to organizational-coordination signals because these contribute negligibly to output-fidelity reconstruction. As AI mediation of brand interactions grows, portfolio architecture becomes strategically invisible to the general-purpose LLM class tested here. Includes zharnikov-2026ac-r21.yaml (Paper Spec v0.1.0) – a machine-readable specification of the paper's claims, assumptions, and dependencies. The paper's full machine-first bundle (the SPINE claim/dependency graph and the ONTOLOGY term module) lives in the public repository; see https://github.com/spectralbranding/paper-spec for the standard. This PDF is generated programmatically from that machine-first source under a research-as-repository model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmitry Zharnikov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: