Key result
Adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin greater reduces coronary atheroma volume post-PCI, cutting PAV by ~1.4%.
Why the study?
Does atorvastatin plus ezetimibe improve coronary plaque regression compared to atorvastatin alone in patients undergoing PCI?
RCT (n=202)
randomly assigned
Yes
Does atorvastatin plus ezetimibe improve coronary plaque regression compared to atorvastatin alone in patients undergoing PCI?
Mean Difference: -1.538 (95% CI -3.079–0.003)
Absolute Event Rate: -1.4% vs -0.3%
p-value: p=0.001
The addition of ezetimibe to atorvastatin resulted in greater coronary plaque regression and lower LDL-C levels compared to atorvastatin monotherapy in patients undergoing PCI.
BACKGROUND: Despite standard statin therapy, a majority of patients retain a high "residual risk" of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ezetimibe plus atorvastatin versus atorvastatin monotherapy on the lipid profile and coronary atherosclerosis in Japanese patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Eligible patients who underwent PCI were randomly assigned to atorvastatin alone or atorvastatin plus ezetimibe (10 mg) daily. Atorvastatin was uptitrated with a treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dl. Serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at baseline and again at 9 to 12 months to quantify the coronary plaque response in 202 patients. RESULTS: The combination of atorvastatin/ezetimibe resulted in lower levels of LDL-C than atorvastatin monotherapy (63.2 ± 16.3 mg/dl vs. 73.3 ± 20.3 mg/dl; p < 0.001). For the absolute change in percent atheroma volume (PAV), the mean difference between the 2 groups (-1.538%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.079% to 0.003%) did not exceed the pre-defined noninferiority margin of 3%, but the absolute change in PAV did show superiority for the dual lipid-lowering strategy (-1.4%; 95% CI: -3.4% to -0.1% vs. -0.3%; 95% CI: -1.9% to 0.9% with atorvastatin alone; p = 0.001). For PAV, a significantly greater percentage of patients who received atorvastatin/ezetimibe showed coronary plaque regression (78% vs. 58%; p = 0.004). Both strategies had acceptable side effect profiles, with a low incidence of laboratory abnormalities and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard statin monotherapy, the combination of statin plus ezetimibe showed greater coronary plaque regression, which might be attributed to cholesterol absorption inhibition-induced aggressive lipid lowering. (Plaque Regression With Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound [PRECISE-IVUS]; NCT01043380).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsujita et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in percutaneous coronary intervention (n=202). atorvastatin plus ezetimibe vs. atorvastatin alone was evaluated on absolute change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) (MD -1.538%, 95% CI -3.079 to 0.003, p=0.001). Atorvastatin plus ezetimibe showed superiority over atorvastatin alone for absolute change in percent atheroma volume (-1.4% vs -0.3%; P=0.001) in patients who underwent PCI.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: