Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes public engagement in urban planning, revealing how it perpetuates hegemony in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong society nowadays is overwhelmed by the rhetoric of hegemony, but there is no serious attempt to discuss it, especially in the domain of urban development. This article expands on Henri Lefebvre’s concept of urbanizing Gramsci to resolve contradictions of space under increasing urbanization by urban specialists and applies it to investigate the public engagement exercise of Central harbourfront planning in Hong Kong. By dissecting its contents and procedures, the article illustrates how public engagement has insisted on technical rationality, thereby perpetuating the functioning of the land (re)development regime. In consequence, the ordinary residents may have been excluded from ‘rational’ consideration in the (re)development of Hong Kong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: