Key result
Extensive debrisoquine metabolizers linked to ~68% shorter propafenone half-life and fewer CNS side effects.
Observational (n=28)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relationship between debrisoquine metabolic phenotype and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone was studied in 28 patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias (22 extensive metabolizers [EMs] and six poor metabolizers [PMs] of debrisoquine). EMs were characterized by a shorter propafenone elimination half-life (5.5 +/- 2.1 vs 17.2 +/- 8.0, p less than .001), lower average plasma concentration (Cp) (1.1 +/- 0.6 vs 2.5 +/- 0.5 ng/ml/mg daily dosage, p less than .001), and higher oral clearance (1115 +/- 1238 vs 264 +/- 48 ml/min, p less than .001). The active metabolite 5-hydroxypropafenone, assayed in 12 patients, was identified in nine of 10 EMs but in neither of the PMs. A lower incidence of central nervous system side effects was noted in EMs (14% vs 67%, p less than .01). The magnitude of QRS widening at any given propafenone Cp was greater in EMs than PMs. There was no significant difference between EMs and PMs in effective propafenone dose or frequency of antiarrhythmic response. Inhibition of debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation by propafenone was demonstrated both in vivo and in a human liver microsomal system in vitro. We conclude that propafenone is metabolized via the same cytochrome P-450 responsible for debrisoquine's 4-hydroxylation, and that its pharmacokinetics and concentration-response relationships and the incidence of central nervous system side effects are different in patients of different debrisoquine metabolic phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddoway et al. (1987) conducted an observational in Chronic ventricular arrhythmias (n=28). Extensive debrisoquine metabolizer phenotype vs. Poor debrisoquine metabolizer phenotype was evaluated on Propafenone elimination half-life (p=<.001). Extensive debrisoquine metabolizers had a significantly shorter propafenone elimination half-life (5.5 vs 17.2, P<0.001) and fewer central nervous system side effects (14% vs 67%, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: