Key result
Exercise two-dimensional echocardiography detected coronary artery disease with 92% sensitivity and 88% specificity, comparing favorably to 71% and 82% for radionuclide ventriculography.
Why the study?
Does exercise two-dimensional echocardiography accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to radionuclide ventriculography in patients evaluated for CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=77)
Does exercise two-dimensional echocardiography accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to radionuclide ventriculography in patients evaluated for CAD?
Absolute Event Rate: 92% vs 71%
Exercise two-dimensional echocardiography is a highly sensitive and specific method for detecting coronary artery disease, performing favorably compared to radionuclide ventriculography.
Post-exercise EF changes may aid CAD detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) was performed in 73 patients evaluated for coronary artery disease (CAD) and in four normal volunteers before and immediately after a maximal treadmill exercise test. Diagnostic images were obtained from the apical and parasternal windows. In 17 patients with normal coronary arteriograms, ejection fraction (EF) increased from 66 +/- 9% (+/- SD) at rest to 73 +/- 8% after exercise (p less than 0.001), while in 56 patients with proved CAD, EF fell from 56 +/- 13% at rest to 53 +/- 16% after exercise (p less than 0.01). The sensitivity of postexercise 2-D echo for detecting CAD (based on abnormal EF response and/or regional dyssynergy) was 91% (51 of 56 patients) and the specificity was 88% (15 of 17). Sensitivity for one-, two- and three-vessel disease was 64% (seven of 11), 95% (20 of 21) and 100%, respectively. Patients with multivessel disease showed a significant fall in a wall motion score index, from 0.79 +/- 0.25 to 0.63 +/- 0.26. Exercise radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) was also performed in 41 of the subjects (17 normals and 24 CAD patients) on a bicycle ergometer. The overall sensitivity of 2-D echo in this subgroup was 92%, compared with 71% for RNV. The sensitivity of 2-D echo for one-vessel disease (n = 4) was 50%, that for two-vessel disease (n = 12) was 100% and that for three-vessel disease (n = 12) was 100%. Respective values for RNV were 0%, 80% and 90%. The specificity of 2-D echo was 88% and that of RNV was 82%. A significantly higher peak heart rate response was observed on the treadmill than on the bicycle ergometer in both CAD patients and normal subjects. We conclude that postexercise 2-D echo is a clinically applicable technique for the diagnosis and evaluation of CAD patients and compares favorably with exercise RNV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Limacher et al. (1983) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=77). Exercise two-dimensional echocardiography vs. Radionuclide ventriculography was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting coronary artery disease. Exercise two-dimensional echocardiography detected coronary artery disease with 92% sensitivity and 88% specificity, comparing favorably to 71% and 82% for radionuclide ventriculography.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: