Key result
Catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mechanical valves showed a non-significant trend toward higher complications (12.6% vs 7.5%, p=0.14) compared to matched controls.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias is increasingly utilized, but nationwide trends in its utilization and procedural complications in patients with mechanical valve prostheses were not well investigated.
Does catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mechanical valves increase the risk of complications and mortality compared to patients without prior valve surgery?
Cohort (n=1,296)
Yes
Does catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mechanical valves increase the risk of complications and mortality compared to patients without prior valve surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.6% vs 7.5%
p-value: p=.14
Catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mechanical valves is increasingly utilized and associated with a non-significant trend toward higher in-hospital complications and mortality compared to patients without mechanical valves.
May signal higher risks with VA ablation in mechanical valve patients; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is increasingly utilized in recent years. We aimed to investigate the nationwide trends in utilization and procedural complications of CA for VAs in patients with mechanical valve (MV) prosthesis. METHODS: We drew data from the US National Inpatient Sample database to identify cases of VA ablations, including premature ventricular contraction and ventricular tachycardia, in patients with MVs, between 2003 and 2015. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected and the incidence of catheter ablation complications, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed. We compared the outcomes to a propensity-matched cohort of patients without prior valve surgery. RESULTS: The study population included a weighted total of 647 CA cases in patients with prior MVs. The annual number of ablations almost doubled, from 34 ablations on average during the "early years" (2003-2008) to 64 on average during the "late years" (2009-2015) of the study (p = .001). Length of stay at the hospital did not differ significantly between patients with MVs and 649 matched patients without prior MVs (5.4 ± 0.4, 4.7 ± 0.3 days, respectively, p = .12). The data revealed a trend toward a higher incidence of complications (12.6% vs. 7.5% respectively, p = .14) and mortality (3.7% vs. 0.7%, respectively, p = .087) among patients with MVs compared to the matched control group, not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The data show increased utilization of VA ablations in patients with MVs and a trend toward a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality and complications compared to the propensity-matched control group without MVs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Ventricular arrhythmias (n=1,296). Presence of mechanical valve prosthesis vs. Propensity-matched cohort without prior valve surgery was evaluated on Procedural complications (p=.14). Catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mechanical valves showed a non-significant trend toward higher complications (12.6% vs 7.5%, p=0.14) compared to matched controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: