Retrospective examination reveals high co-occurrence of abuse, neglect, and domestic violence risks in maltreated children.
Background Child maltreatment––including child abuse and neglect (CAN) and exposure to domestic violence (EDV)––is a pervasive international issue. Although research on maltreatment is extensive, studies of co-occurring CAN and EDV among court-involved samples are limited. Objective Among a court-involved sample of maltreated children referred for expert psychological assessment, this study examined (1) the frequency of CAN and EDV, (2) the co-occurrence of maltreatment subtypes (including EDV), and (3) risk factors associated with co-occurring CAN and EDV. Participants and setting We conducted a retrospective examination of case records for 279 Australian children (child age M = 7.96 years, SD = 4.25 years) within 151 families referred for psychological assessment due to maltreatment-related child protective concerns by the Children's Court of Victoria. Methods Descriptive analyses assessed the frequency and co-occurrence of maltreatment subtypes. Binary logistic regression models examined child, parent, and family-level risk factors associated with co-occurring CAN and EDV. Results Nearly two-thirds (63.44%) of children experienced both CAN and EDV. Over three quarters (77.42%; n = 216) experienced two or more of the five types of maltreatment. The most common combination was EDV with neglect (20.07%, n = 52). Significant risk factors associated with the co-occurrence of CAN and EDV included child (serious behaviour problems), parent (substance use), and family-level (serious family and socioeconomic stress, lack of social support) variables. Conclusions Findings demonstrate the high co-occurrence of CAN and EDV, and their complex risk profile, among court-involved families with these experiences. Implications, including the prioritization of children and families for support and intervention, are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: