Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical diagnostic study reveals interpreter signals for solver selection in exact learning contexts, indicating potential improvements.
Exact interpretable learning is attractive in regulated decision settings, but solver runtime can vary substantially across datasets and solver families. We introduce structural meta-features derived from Feature Interaction Graphs (FIG s) as interpretable signals for solver selection. We construct FIG s from binarized tabular data using pairwise mutual information and extract topology-aware signatures such as density and estimated treewidth. Using a transparent shallow decision-tree selector, we demonstrate that FIG features establish an interpretable structural view of solver behavior, complementing basic, statistical, and landmarking meta-features. Experiments on OpenML classification tasks show that topology-aware profiling exposes meaningful structural variation across datasets, although benchmark saturation prevents clear end-to-end routing gains over strong simple baselines. Our results validate FIG as a principled, interpretable diagnostic tool for algorithm selection in exact learning; its diagnostic relevance becomes apparent on harder instances where solver runtime separation is substantial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: