Machine learning (ML) is ever more frequently used as a tool to aid decision-making. The need to understand the decisions made by ML algorithms has sparked a renewed interest in explainable ML models. A number of known models are often regarded as interpretable by human decision-makers with varying degrees of difficulty. The size of such models plays a crucial role in determining how easily they can be understood by a human. In this paper1 we propose the use of Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) as an interpretable ML model. BDDs can be deemed as interpretable as decision trees (DTs) while offering a often more compact representation due to node sharing. Fixed variable ordering also allows for more concise explanations. We propose a SAT-based approach for learning optimal BDDs that exhibit perfect accuracy on training data. We also explore heuristic methods for computing sub-optimal BDDs, in order to improve scalability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabodi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: