Randomized trial reveals ecological quality trends in the Yangtze River Delta, suggesting targeted monitoring areas.
Fine-scale evidence remains scarce regarding where ecological quality has improved or deteriorated in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and which landscape conditions are associated with these trajectories. We developed a 1 km2 hexagon-based diagnostic framework integrating the Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI), Sen–Mann–Kendall trend analysis, Local Moran’s I clustering, recurrence-based ecological stress typology, and XGBoost–SHAP interpretation for 2000–2025. Annual RSEI was standardized by year to capture relative trajectories of ecological quality rather than absolute change under a fixed loading system. The regional mean RSEI fluctuated markedly and declined only slightly, from 0.639 in 2000 to 0.632 in 2025, suggesting that long-term ecological change was nonlinear. At the hexagon scale, 64.77% of valid units showed positive RSEI trends, with significant improvement covering 15.08% of units and significant degradation covering 5.47%. Local Moran’s I identified distinct High–High and Low–Low clusters; persistent low-quality clusters and stable high-quality areas accounted for 10.0% and 7.8% of valid hexagons, respectively. XGBoost–SHAP results indicated statistical associations between RSEI trends and soil moisture, elevation, impervious surface change, and nighttime light change, rather than direct causal effects. This framework provides a spatially explicit basis for identifying priority monitoring areas, ecological stress zones, and differentiated land management units across rapidly urbanizing megaregions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: