Key result
Arousal reappraisal improves stress interpretation but fails to blunt stress-induced blood pressure responses.
Why the study?
Extreme stressor-evoked psychophysiological responses are associated with adverse health outcomes, prompting evaluation of the individual and combined effects of exercise and arousal reappraisal.
Does acute high-intensity interval exercise, arousal reappraisal, or their combination improve stressor-evoked cardiovascular and psychological responses to an acute speech stressor in healthy young adults?
RCT (n=238)
Block design (blocks of 4) stratified by gender across four groups (CTRL, AR, EX, AR + EX)
No
Does acute high-intensity interval exercise, arousal reappraisal, or their combination improve stressor-evoked cardiovascular and psychological responses to an acute speech stressor in healthy young adults?
A single session of arousal reappraisal promotes more facilitative interpretations of acute psychological stress without altering stressor-evoked blood pressure reactivity, while acute HIIT exercise improves interpretations of physiological arousal only among individuals with high trait reappraisal.
Does not support acute exercise or reappraisal for blunting stressor-evoked blood pressure; extends evidence on reappraisal's selective psychological effects.
Extreme stressor-evoked psychophysiological responses are associated with adverse health outcomes. The present study examined the individual and combined influence of exercise and arousal reappraisal on stressor-evoked psychophysiological responses. Participants (N = 238) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: control (CTRL), arousal reappraisal only (AR), exercise only (EX), or combined arousal reappraisal and exercise (AR + EX). After completing baseline 1, the assigned experimental condition, recovery, and baseline 2, participants underwent a speech task. Cardiovascular measures were obtained during baselines and the stress task, and state psychological measures were obtained after informed consent and after the stress task. Trait reappraisal was also measured. There were no group differences in stressor-evoked cardiovascular responses. However, despite similar stress intensity ratings across all groups, participants in the AR group interpreted their stress more positively. Additionally, moderation analyses demonstrated that individuals with higher trait reappraisal in the EX and AR + EX groups viewed their physiological arousal as more helpful than individuals in the CTRL group. Arousal reappraisal may improve interpretations of acute stress. Additionally, acute exercise may be most beneficial for reducing negative interpretations of perceived physiological arousal when trait reappraisal levels are high. Future research should explore whether repeated arousal reappraisal and exercise training may promote more adaptive stressor-evoked responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cook et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute psychological stress in healthy young adults (n=238). Arousal reappraisal (AR), acute HIIT cycling exercise (EX), or combined arousal reappraisal and acute exercise (AR + EX) vs. Control group (CTRL) watching a 25-minute neutral nature documentary without arousal reappraisal instructions was evaluated on Stressor-evoked cardiovascular responses (SBP, DBP, HR) and state psychological responses (perceived stress and physiological arousal intensity and interpretation) during a 10-minute speech stress task (F(3, 230) = 3.93, partial eta-squared = 0.05 (for perceived stress interpretation), p=0.009). Arousal reappraisal improved stressor-evoked stress interpretation (p=0.009), though neither acute exercise nor reappraisal attenuated blood pressure responses to stress (p>=0.135).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: