Experimental study examines how public agency representation influences trust and perceptions of discrimination in diverse populations.
This study explores how public agency representation and expertise shape citizen perceptions of algorithmic discrimination. Using theories of representative bureaucracy and Human-In-The-Loop (HITL), an experimental design with a general population and an African American sample examines how algorithmic correction approaches influence trust, legitimacy, and perceived performance. Expert involvement increases positive perceptions across samples, with stronger effects observed in the African American sample. Awareness of inclusion boosts trust among the African American sample but has mixed results for the general population. Findings suggest that while technical expertise is crucial, representative inclusion is vital for rebuilding trust within communities historically impacted by discrimination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: