Key result
Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 predicts PICU mortality with good discrimination and ~0.92 AUC.
Why the study?
The Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 is widely used, but its performance needed validation in pediatric intensive care unit patients in Thailand.
Does the PIM3 score accurately predict mortality in pediatric patients admitted to a Thai PICU?
Observational (n=617)
No
Does the PIM3 score accurately predict mortality in pediatric patients admitted to a Thai PICU?
The PIM3 score is a valid tool with good discrimination and acceptable calibration for predicting mortality in a Thai PICU, though it may slightly overpredict mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PIM3 use in Thai PICUs; extends validation to Southeast Asian cohorts.
The Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM3) is a widely used severity-of-illness score. This study aimed to validate PIM3 performance in patients aged < 18 years admitted to a Thai pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This prospective, single-center, observational study included patients aged < 18 years admitted to the PICU between April 1, 2024, and March 31, 2025. PIM3 performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for discrimination. Calibration was primarily evaluated utilizing the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). A total of 617 patients were enrolled, with an observed mortality of 2.43% (15 deaths), lower than the PIM3-predicted mortality of 3.63%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.917 (95% CI 0.842–0.993). The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed no statistically significant difference between observed and predicted mortality (χ² = 7.561; P = 0.478). The standardized mortality ratio was 0.67 (95% CI 0.37–1.11). In this single-center cohort with a low mortality event count, PIM3 demonstrated good discrimination and acceptable calibration, although the SMR suggested a non-statistically significant trend toward overpredicting mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tirawattanapichet et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pediatric intensive care unit admission (n=617). Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM3) vs. Observed mortality was evaluated on Mortality (AUC 0.917, 95% CI 0.842-0.993, p=0.478). The Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.917; 95% CI 0.842-0.993) and acceptable calibration for predicting mortality in a Thai pediatric intensive care unit.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: