Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares MRI scoring systems for adnexal lesions in females, indicating diagnostic performance differences.
Purpose To standardize the interpretation of adnexal lesions, several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based scoring systems have been developed, including the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), the ADNEX-MR score, and the modified ADNEX-MR score. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the standard ADNEX-MR score, the O-RADS MRI system, and the modified ADNEX-MR score in the characterization of adnexal masses, using histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard. Materials and methods A prospective cross-sectional study included 70 females with 88 adnexal masses. All patients underwent conventional pelvic MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE). Each lesion was classified according to the O-RADS MRI system and both classical and modified ADNEX-MR scoring systems. Results The standard ADNEX-MR score demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity (91.2%) and specificity (97.1%). The O-RADS MRI system showed comparable results, with similar sensitivity (91%) and slightly lower specificity (94%). The modified ADNEX-MR score, which incorporates diffusion-weighted imaging as an essential parameter, achieved higher sensitivity (95%) and lower specificity (80%). Conclusion The ADNEX-MR and O-RADS MRI systems demonstrated high and balanced diagnostic performance for adnexal lesion characterization. The modified ADNEX-MR score improved sensitivity and negative predictive value, enhancing malignancy detection, particularly in indeterminate cases or when DCE MRI is unavailable, albeit at the expense of reduced specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: