Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We fit a model to US regional data on income, inequality and intergenerational mobility to derive ‘meritocracy’ and ‘advantage’: high meritocracy implies local labour markets reward human capital; high advantage implies they reward class background. We then characterise how these indices correlate with observable characteristics of regions, finding intuitive results which correlate with common understanding of these terms. Finally, we show there is information in the model: our indices provide extra explanatory power for voting behaviour in the United States. We conclude that using our model to interpret the data at the regional level reveals new insights into regional characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comerford et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: