In their comment letter, Mahdavian et al. (1) wonder about a wider application of our data (2) because, in a cohort of 459 pregnant women, their results were different. Mahdavian et al. have missed the very essence of our study, which was never meant to be a “fractional interpretation of IADPSG recommendations.” Also, nowhere do we question “the helpfulness of the full 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).” On the contrary, we have categorically stated that the current IADPSG guidelines are based on sound scientific data and that they provide the solution …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: