Key result
Real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein potentials during hot balloon ablation achieved acute isolation in 54.8% of applications; TTI-TTRT <4.5s and TTIs <33.5s predicted acute isolation.
Why the study?
Optimal radiofrequency-generated thermal energy applications have not been established for hot balloon ablation systems.
Does real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein potentials predict acute isolation during hot balloon ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
Observational (n=34)
Does real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein potentials predict acute isolation during hot balloon ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
Real-time assessment of pulmonary vein isolation during hot balloon ablation is feasible, and specific time-to-isolation metrics can effectively predict acute isolation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Real-time PV monitoring during HBA is feasible; leaves open whether TTI guidance improves durable isolation.
INTRODUCTION: Optimal radiofrequency-generated thermal energy applications have not been established for hot balloon ablation (HBA) systems. We investigated the feasibility of real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials and optimal time-to-isolation (TTI)-guided application strategies in HBAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Real-time monitoring of PV potentials was performed using a four-electrode unidirectional catheter in 34 consecutive patients. Acute isolation was achieved when PV potentials disappeared during HBAs and were undetected by high-resolution mapping. The TTI, the difference between TTI and the time to reach target temperature (TTRT), and ablation time after isolation were examined for 177 applications in 136 PVs. Real-time monitoring of PV activity was obtained in 167 out of 177 applications (94.3%) and acute isolation was achieved in 97 out of 177 (54.8%) applications. TTI-TTRT was significantly shorter, and ablation times after isolation were significantly longer in the acute isolation group than in the other groups. TTI-TTRT <4.5 seconds and TTIs <33.5 seconds predicted acute isolation (sensitivity 74.2%, specificity 88.4%; sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 76.7%, respectively). Ablation time after isolation >148.5 seconds (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 51.7%) and >120.5 seconds (sensitivity 84.0%, specificity 78.6%) predicted acute isolation in superior PVs and inferior PVs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time assessment of PV isolation can be achieved during HBAs with single-shot techniques. (TTI-TTRT)s <4.5 seconds and TTIs <33.5 seconds predicted for acute isolation. Ablation time after isolation >148.5 seconds in superior PVs and >120.5 seconds in inferior PVs were effective application durations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chikata et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (implied by pulmonary vein isolation) (n=34). Real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein potentials during hot balloon ablation was evaluated on Acute isolation of pulmonary veins. Real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein potentials during hot balloon ablation achieved acute isolation in 54.8% of applications; TTI-TTRT <4.5s and TTIs <33.5s predicted acute isolation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: