Observational
Background: Lung function, assessed by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) and forced vital capacity (FVC), is inversely associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), but these associations could be because of confounding or reversed causality. We conducted a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study, using publicly available data from relevant genome-wide association studies, to examine the role of FEV 1 or FVC on CAD. Methods: We used the most recent genome-wide association studies on lung function to extract genetic instruments related to FEV 1 and FVC (n=92 749). Data on the association between genetic instruments and CAD were obtained from Coronary Artery Disease Genome wide Replication and Meta-analysis plus The Coronary Artery Disease Genetics 1000 Genomes-based genome-wide association studies (60 801 CAD cases and 123 504 controls). We used inverse-variance weighting with a multiplicative random effect to estimate the genetic instrumented association of FEV 1 and FVC on CAD. Sensitivity analyses included weighted median and MR-Egger methods. Results: Each SD greater FEV 1 was associated with a lower risk of CAD (odds ratio, 0.78 per SD; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.98) with a similar magnitude for FVC on CAD risk (odds ratio, 0.82 per SD; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.06). Estimates for FEV 1 were similar when using MR-Egger method (odds ratio, 0.80 per SD; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–1.94) although the magnitude was smaller for weighted median method (odds ratio, 0.93 per SD; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–1.17). Estimates for FVC in the sensitivity analyses were attenuated (median) or changed direction (MR-Egger). Conclusions: Our study suggested an inverse relation between FEV 1 and CAD, but for FVC, evidence is less clear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeung et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease. Genetically predicted lung function (FEV1 and FVC) was evaluated on Coronary artery disease (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: