Essay reflects on the depiction of narcissism in key psychoanalytic books, suggesting deeper understanding.
When I was offered the opportunity to reflect upon the state of narcissism manifest in two recent psychoanalytic works, one of which was my own book, I was of course pleased, but also more than a little intimidated by the daunting task facing me.I was further given to understand that I could include other book(s) I regarded as particularly important.I chose to add Daniel Shaw's book on traumatic narcissism, believing that its inclusion would satisfyingly broaden and deepen the conversation between the books that I was to explore.The Diamond at al. approach is largely an object relations one while Daniel Shaw's orientation is relational.My own is also strongly relational, but is flexibly informed by a variety of different theoretical models, dependent upon my own sense of the tools/ conceptions that best capture a given clinical reality.Since its inception, perhaps beginning with Rank's (1911) and Freud's (1914/1957) initial attempts to grasp what it is, narcissism has challenged those clinicians who have tried to capture its essence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Wood (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: